As a regular reader on this blog, you have probably seen a lot of "What would you do?" hands where the aggressor is betting into me on a checked river. The aggressor, more often than not, bets an unusually strong amount - inconsistent with the action of the hand prior. I understand what my opponent is trying to do: muscle me out of the pot. However, I think there is a sensible way of going about the river bluff. Granted, these hands are far different; I am not suggesting that you bet into represented strength against an opponent who is clearly sending a message that he has a hand and wants value by betting the streets. However, here are a few examples where small bets take down sizable pots, because the read I make is correct; my opponents are on draws.
Full Tilt Poker $0.25/$0.50 No Limit Hold'em - 8 players - http://www.thehandconverter.com/hands/360112
The Official DeucesCracked.com Hand History Converter
BTN: $29.00
SB: $8.00
BB: $38.00
UTG: $50.00
UTG+1: $34.25
MP1: $69.75
Hero (MP2): $85.45
CO: $50.00
Pre Flop: ($0.75) Hero is MP2 with 7s 6s
1 fold, UTG+1 raises to $1, MP1 calls $1, Hero calls $1, 3 folds, BB calls $0.50
Standard suited connector call. Seeing a flop with a lot of players, while holding suited connectors is a good thing.
Flop: ($4.25) 4s 9s 5h (4 players)
BB bets $2, UTG+1 calls $2, MP1 folds, Hero raises to $7.50, BB calls $5.50, UTG+1 folds
BB's cbet is like 100%. This guy had been aggressive. In addition, I flop an open-ended straight flush draw. It is well-concealed by my raise. This hand is a monster draw.
Turn: ($21.25) Kc (2 players)
BB checks, Hero checks
I have half of the equity now. I want to control the size of the pot - but at this point, I am putting BB on a draw as well - likely the spade draw.
River: ($21.25) 4c (2 players)
BB checks, Hero bets $5, BB folds
The spade draw doesn't get there - the BB has all but shut down, and I make a small bet, which I don't think he'll call because he didn't hit his overs or spades. For $5.00, I win the $21.25 pot.
Final Pot: $21.25
Hero wins $20.20
(Rake: $1.05)
Full Tilt Poker $0.25/$0.50 No Limit Hold'em - 8 players - http://www.thehandconverter.com/hands/360113
The Official DeucesCracked.com Hand History Converter
UTG: $13.00
UTG+1: $11.40
MP1: $21.60
MP2: $18.60
CO: $71.55
BTN: $58.50
Hero (SB): $55.90
BB: $11.10
Pre Flop: ($0.75) Hero is SB with 3s Ac
1 fold, UTG+1 calls $0.50, 4 folds, Hero calls $0.25, BB checks
Ace connector limp from SB.
Flop: ($1.50) Js 8s 5s (3 players)
Hero checks, BB checks, UTG+1 checks
Turn: ($1.50) Qc (3 players)
Hero bets $1, BB folds, UTG+1 calls $1
I'm going to take a stab at this with the innocuous Queen of clubs. If I get callers, I'm going to assume they're looking for an additional spade. However, given the prior action, none of the players have tried to build a pot, nor tried to stab at it. In fact, A high may even be the best hand to this point.
River: ($3.50) 6d (2 players)
Hero bets $1.25, UTG+1 folds
Given the lack of aggression, a non-spade river card, and a non-overcard to the Q, I'm going to make a small "value" bet on the river, which I expect the UTG+1 to fold. It works, and for $1.25, I win $3.50.
Final Pot: $3.50
Hero wins $3.35
(Rake: $0.15)
Monday, November 16, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(265)
-
▼
November
(52)
- What would you do? #32
- Odds scenarios
- What would you do? #31
- What would you do? #30
- Englightenment... my short history
- What would you do? #29
- Royal flush time
- What would you do? #28
- Winning Stacks by Ed Miller
- What would you do? #28
- Dropping down a level
- What would you do? #27
- What would you do? #26
- Start anew every session
- A literal bad beat
- What would you do? #25
- Cheap steals
- $5 bonus from me for signup with RakeTheRake & Ful...
- What would you do? #24
- Betting on the end.
- What would you do? #23
- Biggest $ pot won #3
- Flopped quads (again)
- Biggest session to date 2009-11-13
- Equity in a pot / thoughts on expected value
- Good play by a donk or am I a donk?
- Not running good, but flopped quads helps...
- What would you do? #22
- Statistical anomalies
- What would you do? #21
- Pre- and post- game process - Part IV
- What would you do? #20
- Pre- and post- game process - Part III
- What would you do? #19
- Not really sure what I did wrong here...
- Breaking Down the 3-Bet
- Pre- and post- game process - Part II
- What would you do? #18
- New Tommy Angelo post on live poker & representing...
- The Poker Meister #36
- Pre- and post- game process - Part I
- Flopped quads
- Played in the Mookie last night..
- The plan to $100NL
- What would you do? #17
- 22" ViewSonic 1080p LCD Monitor $128
- Running well again
- Suicide bluff?
- A rare home game for a little live poker
- Calling for value?
- What would you do? #16
- An up & down (and up) month... October [thankfull...
-
▼
November
(52)
I think there is a key point that you didn't mention specifically. The reason to bet small on the river is not only to pick up the pot, but also to avoid over-exposure. There are two possibilities, generally speaking: he has it or he doesn't. Your bet is really a bet that he does not have it. Now, with that said, if you bet $5 into a $25 pot and he has it, he's going to call or maybe raise, at which point, you fold and lose $5. If he doesn't have it, he folds and you win $25. That play only has to work 1/5 times to break even, and as you noted, this should only be done when you have a real reason to believe that your opponent has nothing. Therefore, its a good play.
ReplyDeleteOn the flipside, you could've bet $25 to take down the $25 pot, but in that scenario, you have to be right 1/2 of the time to break even, which is a lot more than 1/5 in the $5 into $25 pot scenario.
In these situations, a small bet will get the same reaction as a big bet, and since you are not trying to build a pot, small is the way to go.