It's been awhile since I've hit a J9s hand... This is a pretty good payoff; I got about half his stack in the middle...
Full Tilt Poker $0.25/$0.50 No Limit Hold'em - 9 players
The Official DeucesCracked.com Hand History Converter
Hero (BTN): $66.05
SB: $48.00
BB: $27.65
UTG: $55.35
UTG+1: $82.30
UTG+2: $202.00
MP1: $73.60
MP2: $42.60
CO: $89.75
Pre Flop: ($0.75) Hero is BTN with 9s Js
3 folds, MP1 raises to $1.75, 2 folds, Hero calls $1.75, 1 fold, BB calls $1.25
Flop: ($5.50) 6s Kh 3s (3 players)
BB checks, MP1 bets $5.50, Hero calls $5.50, BB folds
Turn: ($16.50) 7s (2 players)
MP1 checks, Hero bets $10, MP1 calls $10
River: ($36.50) Qd (2 players)
MP1 checks, Hero bets $24.50, MP1 requests TIME, MP1 calls $24.50
Final Pot: $85.50
Hero shows 9s Js (a flush, Jack high)
MP1 mucks Kd As
Hero wins $82.50
(Rake: $3.00)
Thursday, April 28, 2011
Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Card cheating with the deal / 2p2 Concept of the Week
If you play live / backrooms or home games, this is worth 10 minutes of time invested. Although not entirely definitive, this should certainly help catch a hanger / cheat from stacking the deck.
It's an interesting video if you have the time.
Courtesy of x_ROSH125_x's blog and twoplustwo.com via blackchilliwing.
It's an interesting video if you have the time.
Courtesy of x_ROSH125_x's blog and twoplustwo.com via blackchilliwing.
Tuesday, April 26, 2011
No sooner than I wonder.... Pokerstars responds!
Dear xxx,
In light of recent developments, PokerStars is no longer offering real money play to residents of the United States of America and its territories.
The PokerStars Cashier is now available for you to cash out the funds in your real money account balance. We strongly recommend that you use the bank transfer option; to use it, you will need to have your current banking information at hand.
Please note that due to the expected high volume of cashout requests, we anticipate a delay in processing and delivery of your funds. Rest assured that your funds are safe and we will process your request as soon as possible.
Please contact paymentservices@pokerstars.com if you experience any issues.
Thank you for your patience and understanding.
Regards,
PokerStars Support
In light of recent developments, PokerStars is no longer offering real money play to residents of the United States of America and its territories.
The PokerStars Cashier is now available for you to cash out the funds in your real money account balance. We strongly recommend that you use the bank transfer option; to use it, you will need to have your current banking information at hand.
Please note that due to the expected high volume of cashout requests, we anticipate a delay in processing and delivery of your funds. Rest assured that your funds are safe and we will process your request as soon as possible.
Please contact paymentservices@pokerstars.com if you experience any issues.
Thank you for your patience and understanding.
Regards,
PokerStars Support
When and how? Cashout for P* & FT
About a week and a half later, and I'm still waiting to be able to process my withdrawal request from both Full Tilt & Pokerstars. I'm not so much concerned about the money, but I am concerned about the optimal way of cashing out. I tried the withdrawal function on Pokerstars last night and got nowhere.
As far as Pokerstars is concerned, they've already released a cash out FAQ on 2p2 as well as numerous other places, addressing how they will work with tournament tickets & T$; they will be converting them to cash. I currently have 3 $215 SCOOP tickets (won in the WBCOOP events), as well as a $215 Sunday Millions entry, a $55 SCOOP entry, a Step 1 ($7.50) ticket and Step 2 ($27) ticket. From my rough estimates, I figure the cumulative of those tickets is worth around $850-900. Nice!
However, it seems as though Full Tilt has been quiet on the issue of cash outs. Rumor has it that they will follow Pokerstar's lead, cashing out tickets & T$, but what will happen to the Iron Man medals & Full Tilt Points? I have been playing on Full Tilt for long enough that I have built up a "significant" amount of points and medals - I've been using the medals to play the daily $27 guarantees prior to the US shutdown, but I still have 1100+ medals, and 160k+ points, with 2 $27 tournament entry tickets remaining in my account. Should I convert my medals / points to tickets, figuring I'll get better value than a payout of the points directly? The tournament entry tickets are the best value, and if they give me a pittance for points -> $$$ conversion, perhaps I'd be better off preemptively converting my points / medals -> tickets.
Any thoughts / suggestions?
As far as Pokerstars is concerned, they've already released a cash out FAQ on 2p2 as well as numerous other places, addressing how they will work with tournament tickets & T$; they will be converting them to cash. I currently have 3 $215 SCOOP tickets (won in the WBCOOP events), as well as a $215 Sunday Millions entry, a $55 SCOOP entry, a Step 1 ($7.50) ticket and Step 2 ($27) ticket. From my rough estimates, I figure the cumulative of those tickets is worth around $850-900. Nice!
However, it seems as though Full Tilt has been quiet on the issue of cash outs. Rumor has it that they will follow Pokerstar's lead, cashing out tickets & T$, but what will happen to the Iron Man medals & Full Tilt Points? I have been playing on Full Tilt for long enough that I have built up a "significant" amount of points and medals - I've been using the medals to play the daily $27 guarantees prior to the US shutdown, but I still have 1100+ medals, and 160k+ points, with 2 $27 tournament entry tickets remaining in my account. Should I convert my medals / points to tickets, figuring I'll get better value than a payout of the points directly? The tournament entry tickets are the best value, and if they give me a pittance for points -> $$$ conversion, perhaps I'd be better off preemptively converting my points / medals -> tickets.
Any thoughts / suggestions?
Wednesday, April 20, 2011
A bit of good news - we'll get our money back!
If there's a silver lining to the cloud called "Death of U.S. online poker," it seems to be the fact that the U.S. government will be enabling Full Tilt & Pokerstars to refund the player-held money back to the rightful owners.
The official government memorandum / release is located here:
Justice Department's Press Release
CNN's summary of the breaking news is located here:
Online poker players to be reunited with cash
While I'm ecstatic about this breaking news, I'm still disappointed by my government's decision to enforce what seems to me to be a senseless law. Isn't it time that we grasp the new technology called the internet and allow people to enjoy their hobbies within the confines of their home or wherever place of choice? Come on, Congress! Get with the program. Legalize online gaming for money!
The official government memorandum / release is located here:
Justice Department's Press Release
CNN's summary of the breaking news is located here:
Online poker players to be reunited with cash
While I'm ecstatic about this breaking news, I'm still disappointed by my government's decision to enforce what seems to me to be a senseless law. Isn't it time that we grasp the new technology called the internet and allow people to enjoy their hobbies within the confines of their home or wherever place of choice? Come on, Congress! Get with the program. Legalize online gaming for money!
Monday, April 18, 2011
Hand charts... A Monte Carlo simulation
Life continues. I don't plan on a cessation from posting on this blog. HHs may get thin, content may get thing, but I do plan on keeping this blog active & alive. Anyway, on with the post for today:
Hoyazo was bemoaning his play with KQ (suited or not), so we've had a bit of back and forth regarding the merits of playing that particular hand from early position. It was my stance that KQ is a second-tier hand, whereby there is negligible difference between JJ and KQs. In other words, if you dump KQs in EP, you should consider dumping JJ and other manner of hands. My basis for that statement is absolute hand strength; KQs shows up among the top 10 strongest hands in terms of total hands strength, i.e. if you take X amount of players, deal them 2 cards each and deal a flop, turn and river, KQs is among the top ten winners (in a 6+ -person game). Granted, this simulation is not entirely realistic; it does not take into account folds, bluffs, boards, etc., but it gives some ground for which one can derive hands that he should or should not be playing. It is also worth noting that the simulation does not take into account opposing hands; i.e. in a heads-up battle, even though KQs may be a 63.4% overall, it is certainly dominated by AK, AQ, AA, KK, and QQ. However, it is either ahead of, dominating, or flipping with all other hands non-Ace hands, and slightly behind any Ax (excluding the above) hands. Given that status on the hierarchy, I believe that KQ is a playable hand from all positions - particularly KQs - and one should continue to raise KQ.
DISCLAIMER: Obviously, situations change and the above is my overall opinion; if I'm in a very tight game and get called holding KQ, I'm probably questioning whether I'm ahead on most flops, but in a loose game, I'm going to be very comfortable with most flops where I hit a King or Queen. Moreover, if I'm getting 3bet from a tighter / normal 3 bettor, I'm inclined to fold this hand, as it won't flop big and the standard 3bet range includes many hands that dominate KQ. Finally, I recognize that this hand generally flops a medium strength hand when it connects; therefore, if I'm meeting a lot of resistance, I'm not putting a TON of faith in this hand.
Finally, I have placed the chart below, for your convenience. For what it's worth, it is sorted by a 9-player game, though the hand strengths don't move significantly until you sort by 2 players. I'd imagine that you can copy this hand chart into an excel spreadsheet and manipulate it as you see fit. In my journey to become a more serious poker player, I used this to define my pre-flop starting hands, before I realize the multitude of other resources available. Enjoy!
Hoyazo was bemoaning his play with KQ (suited or not), so we've had a bit of back and forth regarding the merits of playing that particular hand from early position. It was my stance that KQ is a second-tier hand, whereby there is negligible difference between JJ and KQs. In other words, if you dump KQs in EP, you should consider dumping JJ and other manner of hands. My basis for that statement is absolute hand strength; KQs shows up among the top 10 strongest hands in terms of total hands strength, i.e. if you take X amount of players, deal them 2 cards each and deal a flop, turn and river, KQs is among the top ten winners (in a 6+ -person game). Granted, this simulation is not entirely realistic; it does not take into account folds, bluffs, boards, etc., but it gives some ground for which one can derive hands that he should or should not be playing. It is also worth noting that the simulation does not take into account opposing hands; i.e. in a heads-up battle, even though KQs may be a 63.4% overall, it is certainly dominated by AK, AQ, AA, KK, and QQ. However, it is either ahead of, dominating, or flipping with all other hands non-Ace hands, and slightly behind any Ax (excluding the above) hands. Given that status on the hierarchy, I believe that KQ is a playable hand from all positions - particularly KQs - and one should continue to raise KQ.
DISCLAIMER: Obviously, situations change and the above is my overall opinion; if I'm in a very tight game and get called holding KQ, I'm probably questioning whether I'm ahead on most flops, but in a loose game, I'm going to be very comfortable with most flops where I hit a King or Queen. Moreover, if I'm getting 3bet from a tighter / normal 3 bettor, I'm inclined to fold this hand, as it won't flop big and the standard 3bet range includes many hands that dominate KQ. Finally, I recognize that this hand generally flops a medium strength hand when it connects; therefore, if I'm meeting a lot of resistance, I'm not putting a TON of faith in this hand.
Finally, I have placed the chart below, for your convenience. For what it's worth, it is sorted by a 9-player game, though the hand strengths don't move significantly until you sort by 2 players. I'd imagine that you can copy this hand chart into an excel spreadsheet and manipulate it as you see fit. In my journey to become a more serious poker player, I used this to define my pre-flop starting hands, before I realize the multitude of other resources available. Enjoy!
Players | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
AA | 85.3% | 73.4% | 63.9% | 55.9% | 49.2% | 43.6% | 38.8% | 34.7% | 31.1% |
KK | 82.4% | 68.9% | 58.2% | 49.8% | 43.0% | 37.5% | 32.9% | 29.2% | 26.1% |
79.9% | 64.9% | 53.5% | 44.7% | 37.9% | 32.5% | 28.3% | 24.9% | 22.2% | |
AKs | 67.0% | 50.7% | 41.4% | 35.4% | 31.1% | 27.7% | 25.0% | 22.7% | 20.7% |
JJ | 77.5% | 61.2% | 49.2% | 40.3% | 33.6% | 28.5% | 24.6% | 21.6% | 19.3% |
AQs | 66.1% | 49.4% | 39.9% | 33.7% | 29.4% | 26.0% | 23.3% | 21.1% | 19.3% |
KQs | 63.4% | 47.1% | 38.2% | 32.5% | 28.3% | 25.1% | 22.5% | 20.4% | 18.6% |
AJs | 65.4% | 48.2% | 38.5% | 32.2% | 27.8% | 24.5% | 22.0% | 19.9% | 18.1% |
KJs | 62.6% | 45.9% | 36.8% | 31.1% | 26.9% | 23.8% | 21.3% | 19.3% | 17.6% |
TT | 75.1% | 57.7% | 45.2% | 36.4% | 30.0% | 25.3% | 21.8% | 19.2% | 17.2% |
AKo | 65.4% | 48.2% | 38.6% | 32.4% | 27.9% | 24.4% | 21.6% | 19.2% | 17.2% |
ATs | 64.7% | 47.1% | 37.2% | 31.0% | 26.7% | 23.5% | 21.0% | 18.9% | 17.3% |
QJs | 60.3% | 44.1% | 35.6% | 30.1% | 26.1% | 23.0% | 20.7% | 18.7% | 17.1% |
KTs | 61.9% | 44.9% | 35.7% | 29.9% | 25.8% | 22.8% | 20.4% | 18.5% | 16.9% |
QTs | 59.5% | 43.1% | 34.6% | 29.1% | 25.2% | 22.3% | 19.9% | 18.1% | 16.6% |
JTs | 57.5% | 41.9% | 33.8% | 28.5% | 24.7% | 21.9% | 19.7% | 17.9% | 16.5% |
AQo | 64.5% | 46.8% | 36.9% | 30.4% | 25.9% | 22.5% | 19.7% | 17.5% | 15.5% |
99 | 72.1% | 53.5% | 41.1% | 32.6% | 26.6% | 22.4% | 19.4% | 17.2% | 15.6% |
A9s | 63.0% | 44.8% | 34.6% | 28.4% | 24.2% | 21.1% | 18.8% | 16.9% | 15.4% |
KQo | 61.4% | 44.4% | 35.2% | 29.3% | 25.1% | 21.8% | 19.1% | 16.9% | 15.1% |
K9s | 60.0% | 42.4% | 32.9% | 27.2% | 23.2% | 20.3% | 18.1% | 16.3% | 14.8% |
A8s | 62.1% | 43.7% | 33.6% | 27.4% | 23.3% | 20.3% | 18.0% | 16.2% | 14.8% |
T9s | 54.3% | 38.9% | 31.0% | 26.0% | 22.5% | 19.8% | 17.8% | 16.2% | 14.9% |
AJo | 63.6% | 45.6% | 35.4% | 28.9% | 24.4% | 21.0% | 18.3% | 16.1% | 14.3% |
A5s | 59.9% | 41.4% | 31.8% | 26.0% | 22.2% | 19.6% | 17.5% | 15.9% | 14.5% |
Q9s | 57.9% | 40.7% | 31.9% | 26.4% | 22.5% | 19.7% | 17.6% | 15.9% | 14.5% |
J9s | 55.8% | 39.6% | 31.3% | 26.1% | 22.4% | 19.7% | 17.6% | 15.9% | 14.6% |
88 | 69.1% | 49.9% | 37.5% | 29.4% | 24.0% | 20.3% | 17.7% | 15.8% | 14.4% |
A7s | 61.1% | 42.6% | 32.6% | 26.5% | 22.5% | 19.6% | 17.4% | 15.7% | 14.3% |
KJo | 60.6% | 43.1% | 33.6% | 27.6% | 23.5% | 20.2% | 17.7% | 15.6% | 13.9% |
A4s | 58.9% | 40.4% | 30.9% | 25.3% | 21.6% | 19.0% | 17.0% | 15.5% | 14.2% |
A6s | 60.0% | 41.3% | 31.4% | 25.6% | 21.7% | 19.0% | 16.9% | 15.3% | 14.0% |
QJo | 58.2% | 41.4% | 32.6% | 26.9% | 22.9% | 19.8% | 17.3% | 15.3% | 13.7% |
ATo | 62.9% | 44.4% | 34.1% | 27.6% | 23.1% | 19.8% | 17.2% | 15.1% | 13.4% |
A3s | 58.0% | 39.4% | 30.0% | 24.6% | 21.0% | 18.5% | 16.6% | 15.1% | 13.9% |
77 | 66.2% | 46.4% | 34.4% | 26.8% | 21.9% | 18.6% | 16.4% | 14.8% | 13.7% |
K8s | 58.5% | 40.2% | 30.8% | 25.1% | 21.3% | 18.6% | 16.5% | 14.8% | 13.5% |
T8s | 52.6% | 36.9% | 29.0% | 24.0% | 20.6% | 18.1% | 16.2% | 14.8% | 13.6% |
KTo | 59.9% | 42.0% | 32.5% | 26.5% | 22.3% | 19.2% | 16.7% | 14.7% | 13.1% |
A2s | 57.0% | 38.5% | 29.2% | 23.9% | 20.4% | 18.0% | 16.1% | 14.6% | 13.4% |
K7s | 57.8% | 39.4% | 30.1% | 24.5% | 20.8% | 18.1% | 16.0% | 14.5% | 13.2% |
JTo | 55.4% | 39.0% | 30.7% | 25.3% | 21.5% | 18.6% | 16.3% | 14.5% | 13.1% |
98s | 51.1% | 36.0% | 28.5% | 23.6% | 20.2% | 17.8% | 15.9% | 14.5% | 13.4% |
QTo | 57.4% | 40.2% | 31.3% | 25.7% | 21.6% | 18.6% | 16.3% | 14.4% | 12.9% |
Q8s | 56.2% | 38.6% | 29.7% | 24.4% | 20.7% | 18.0% | 16.0% | 14.4% | 13.2% |
J8s | 54.2% | 37.5% | 29.1% | 24.0% | 20.5% | 17.9% | 15.9% | 14.4% | 13.2% |
66 | 63.3% | 43.2% | 31.5% | 24.5% | 20.1% | 17.3% | 15.4% | 14.0% | 13.1% |
K6s | 56.8% | 38.4% | 29.1% | 23.7% | 20.1% | 17.5% | 15.6% | 14.0% | 12.8% |
K5s | 55.8% | 37.4% | 28.2% | 23.0% | 19.5% | 17.0% | 15.2% | 13.7% | 12.5% |
87s | 48.2% | 33.9% | 26.6% | 22.0% | 18.9% | 16.7% | 15.0% | 13.7% | 12.7% |
97s | 49.5% | 34.2% | 26.8% | 22.1% | 18.9% | 16.6% | 14.9% | 13.6% | 12.5% |
T7s | 51.0% | 34.9% | 27.0% | 22.2% | 19.0% | 16.6% | 14.8% | 13.5% | 12.4% |
K4s | 54.7% | 36.4% | 27.4% | 22.3% | 19.0% | 16.6% | 14.8% | 13.4% | 12.3% |
Q7s | 54.5% | 36.7% | 27.9% | 22.7% | 19.2% | 16.7% | 14.8% | 13.3% | 12.1% |
55 | 60.3% | 40.1% | 28.8% | 22.4% | 18.5% | 16.0% | 14.4% | 13.2% | 12.3% |
J7s | 52.4% | 35.4% | 27.1% | 22.2% | 18.9% | 16.4% | 14.6% | 13.2% | 12.0% |
76s | 45.7% | 32.0% | 25.1% | 20.8% | 18.0% | 15.9% | 14.4% | 13.2% | 12.3% |
K3s | 53.8% | 35.5% | 26.7% | 21.7% | 18.4% | 16.2% | 14.5% | 13.1% | 12.1% |
K2s | 52.9% | 34.6% | 26.0% | 21.2% | 18.1% | 15.9% | 14.3% | 13.0% | 11.9% |
44 | 57.0% | 36.8% | 26.3% | 20.6% | 17.3% | 15.2% | 13.9% | 12.9% | 12.1% |
Q6s | 53.8% | 35.8% | 27.1% | 21.9% | 18.5% | 16.1% | 14.3% | 12.9% | 11.7% |
86s | 46.5% | 32.0% | 25.0% | 20.6% | 17.6% | 15.6% | 14.1% | 12.9% | 11.9% |
A9o | 60.9% | 41.8% | 31.2% | 24.7% | 20.3% | 17.1% | 14.7% | 12.8% | 11.2% |
Q5s | 52.9% | 34.9% | 26.3% | 21.4% | 18.1% | 15.8% | 14.1% | 12.7% | 11.6% |
65s | 43.2% | 30.2% | 23.7% | 19.7% | 17.0% | 15.2% | 13.8% | 12.7% | 11.9% |
33 | 53.7% | 33.5% | 23.9% | 19.0% | 16.2% | 14.6% | 13.5% | 12.6% | 12.0% |
T9o | 51.7% | 35.7% | 27.7% | 22.5% | 18.9% | 16.2% | 14.1% | 12.6% | 11.3% |
22 | 50.3% | 30.7% | 22.0% | 17.8% | 15.5% | 14.2% | 13.3% | 12.5% | 12.0% |
54s | 41.1% | 28.8% | 22.6% | 18.9% | 16.5% | 14.8% | 13.5% | 12.5% | 11.7% |
Q4s | 51.7% | 33.9% | 25.5% | 20.7% | 17.6% | 15.4% | 13.7% | 12.4% | 11.3% |
96s | 47.7% | 32.3% | 24.9% | 20.4% | 17.4% | 15.3% | 13.7% | 12.4% | 11.4% |
K9o | 58.0% | 39.5% | 29.6% | 23.6% | 19.5% | 16.5% | 14.1% | 12.3% | 10.8% |
T6s | 49.2% | 32.8% | 25.1% | 20.5% | 17.4% | 15.2% | 13.6% | 12.3% | 11.2% |
75s | 43.8% | 30.1% | 23.4% | 19.4% | 16.7% | 14.8% | 13.4% | 12.3% | 11.4% |
Q9o | 55.5% | 37.6% | 28.5% | 22.9% | 19.0% | 16.1% | 13.8% | 12.1% | 10.7% |
J9o | 53.4% | 36.5% | 27.9% | 22.5% | 18.7% | 15.9% | 13.8% | 12.1% | 10.8% |
J6s | 50.8% | 33.6% | 25.4% | 20.6% | 17.4% | 15.2% | 13.5% | 12.1% | 11.1% |
Q3s | 50.7% | 33.0% | 24.7% | 20.1% | 17.0% | 14.9% | 13.3% | 12.1% | 11.1% |
A8o | 60.1% | 40.8% | 30.1% | 23.7% | 19.4% | 16.2% | 13.9% | 12.0% | 10.6% |
Q2s | 49.9% | 32.2% | 24.0% | 19.5% | 16.6% | 14.6% | 13.1% | 11.9% | 10.9% |
64s | 41.4% | 28.5% | 22.1% | 18.4% | 15.9% | 14.2% | 12.9% | 11.9% | 11.1% |
J5s | 50.0% | 32.8% | 24.7% | 20.0% | 17.0% | 14.7% | 13.1% | 11.8% | 10.8% |
85s | 44.8% | 30.2% | 23.2% | 19.1% | 16.3% | 14.3% | 12.9% | 11.8% | 10.9% |
53s | 39.3% | 27.1% | 21.1% | 17.5% | 15.2% | 13.7% | 12.5% | 11.6% | 10.8% |
A5o | 57.7% | 38.2% | 27.9% | 22.0% | 18.0% | 15.2% | 13.1% | 11.5% | 10.1% |
J4s | 49.0% | 31.8% | 24.0% | 19.4% | 16.4% | 14.3% | 12.8% | 11.5% | 10.6% |
A7o | 59.1% | 39.4% | 28.9% | 22.6% | 18.4% | 15.4% | 13.2% | 11.4% | 10.1% |
J3s | 47.9% | 30.9% | 23.2% | 18.8% | 16.0% | 14.0% | 12.5% | 11.3% | 10.4% |
95s | 45.9% | 30.4% | 23.2% | 18.8% | 16.0% | 13.9% | 12.4% | 11.3% | 10.3% |
T5s | 47.2% | 30.8% | 23.3% | 18.9% | 16.0% | 13.9% | 12.4% | 11.2% | 10.2% |
74s | 41.8% | 28.2% | 21.7% | 17.9% | 15.3% | 13.5% | 12.2% | 11.2% | 10.4% |
J2s | 47.1% | 30.1% | 22.6% | 18.3% | 15.6% | 13.7% | 12.2% | 11.1% | 10.2% |
43s | 38.0% | 26.2% | 20.3% | 16.9% | 14.7% | 13.1% | 12.0% | 11.1% | 10.3% |
A4o | 56.4% | 36.9% | 26.9% | 21.1% | 17.3% | 14.7% | 12.6% | 11.0% | 9.8% |
T8o | 50.0% | 33.6% | 25.4% | 20.4% | 16.9% | 14.4% | 12.5% | 11.0% | 9.9% |
T4s | 46.4% | 30.1% | 22.7% | 18.4% | 15.6% | 13.6% | 12.1% | 11.0% | 10.0% |
A6o | 57.8% | 38.0% | 27.6% | 21.5% | 17.5% | 14.7% | 12.6% | 10.9% | 9.6% |
98o | 48.4% | 32.9% | 25.1% | 20.1% | 16.6% | 14.2% | 12.3% | 10.9% | 9.9% |
K8o | 56.3% | 37.2% | 27.3% | 21.4% | 17.4% | 14.6% | 12.5% | 10.8% | 9.4% |
63s | 39.4% | 26.5% | 20.4% | 16.8% | 14.5% | 12.9% | 11.7% | 10.8% | 10.0% |
A3o | 55.6% | 35.9% | 26.1% | 20.4% | 16.7% | 14.2% | 12.2% | 10.7% | 9.5% |
J8o | 51.7% | 34.2% | 25.6% | 20.4% | 16.8% | 14.1% | 12.2% | 10.7% | 9.5% |
T3s | 45.5% | 29.3% | 22.0% | 17.8% | 15.1% | 13.2% | 11.8% | 10.7% | 9.8% |
84s | 42.7% | 28.1% | 21.4% | 17.4% | 14.8% | 13.0% | 11.7% | 10.6% | 9.8% |
52s | 37.5% | 25.3% | 19.5% | 16.1% | 14.0% | 12.5% | 11.4% | 10.6% | 9.8% |
Q8o | 53.8% | 35.4% | 26.2% | 20.6% | 16.9% | 14.1% | 12.1% | 10.5% | 9.2% |
T2s | 44.7% | 28.5% | 21.4% | 17.4% | 14.8% | 13.0% | 11.6% | 10.5% | 9.7% |
42s | 36.3% | 24.6% | 18.8% | 15.7% | 13.7% | 12.3% | 11.2% | 10.4% | 9.6% |
87o | 45.5% | 30.6% | 23.2% | 18.5% | 15.4% | 13.1% | 11.5% | 10.3% | 9.3% |
94s | 43.8% | 28.4% | 21.3% | 17.3% | 14.6% | 12.7% | 11.3% | 10.3% | 9.4% |
K7o | 55.4% | 36.1% | 26.3% | 20.5% | 16.7% | 13.9% | 11.8% | 10.2% | 9.0% |
A2o | 54.6% | 35.0% | 25.2% | 19.6% | 16.1% | 13.6% | 11.7% | 10.2% | 9.1% |
93s | 43.2% | 27.8% | 20.8% | 16.8% | 14.3% | 12.5% | 11.1% | 10.1% | 9.2% |
73s | 40.0% | 26.3% | 20.0% | 16.4% | 14.0% | 12.3% | 11.1% | 10.1% | 9.3% |
92s | 42.3% | 27.0% | 20.2% | 16.4% | 13.9% | 12.2% | 10.9% | 9.9% | 9.1% |
32s | 35.1% | 23.6% | 18.0% | 14.9% | 13.0% | 11.7% | 10.7% | 9.9% | 9.2% |
K6o | 54.3% | 35.0% | 25.3% | 19.7% | 16.0% | 13.3% | 11.3% | 9.8% | 8.6% |
97o | 46.7% | 30.9% | 23.1% | 18.4% | 15.1% | 12.8% | 11.1% | 9.8% | 8.8% |
62s | 37.5% | 24.8% | 18.8% | 15.4% | 13.3% | 11.8% | 10.7% | 9.8% | 9.1% |
T7o | 48.2% | 31.4% | 23.4% | 18.4% | 15.1% | 12.8% | 11.0% | 9.7% | 8.6% |
83s | 40.8% | 26.3% | 19.8% | 16.0% | 13.6% | 11.9% | 10.7% | 9.7% | 8.9% |
76o | 42.7% | 28.5% | 21.5% | 17.1% | 14.2% | 12.2% | 10.8% | 9.6% | 8.8% |
82s | 40.3% | 25.8% | 19.4% | 15.7% | 13.3% | 11.7% | 10.5% | 9.6% | 8.8% |
K5o | 53.3% | 34.0% | 24.5% | 19.0% | 15.4% | 12.9% | 11.0% | 9.5% | 8.3% |
Q7o | 51.9% | 33.2% | 24.0% | 18.6% | 15.1% | 12.5% | 10.6% | 9.2% | 8.0% |
J7o | 49.9% | 32.1% | 23.5% | 18.3% | 14.9% | 12.4% | 10.6% | 9.2% | 8.1% |
86o | 43.6% | 28.6% | 21.3% | 16.9% | 13.9% | 11.8% | 10.4% | 9.2% | 8.3% |
65o | 40.1% | 26.7% | 20.0% | 15.9% | 13.3% | 11.5% | 10.2% | 9.2% | 8.5% |
72s | 38.1% | 24.5% | 18.4% | 15.0% | 12.8% | 11.2% | 10.1% | 9.2% | 8.5% |
K4o | 52.1% | 32.8% | 23.4% | 18.1% | 14.7% | 12.3% | 10.5% | 9.1% | 8.0% |
K3o | 51.2% | 31.9% | 22.7% | 17.6% | 14.2% | 11.9% | 10.2% | 8.9% | 7.8% |
54o | 37.9% | 25.2% | 18.8% | 15.0% | 12.6% | 11.0% | 9.8% | 8.9% | 8.2% |
Q6o | 51.1% | 32.3% | 23.2% | 17.9% | 14.4% | 12.0% | 10.1% | 8.8% | 7.6% |
96o | 44.9% | 28.8% | 21.2% | 16.6% | 13.5% | 11.4% | 9.8% | 8.7% | 7.8% |
75o | 40.8% | 26.5% | 19.7% | 15.5% | 12.8% | 11.0% | 9.7% | 8.7% | 7.9% |
K2o | 50.2% | 30.9% | 21.8% | 16.9% | 13.7% | 11.5% | 9.8% | 8.6% | 7.6% |
Q5o | 50.2% | 31.3% | 22.3% | 17.3% | 13.9% | 11.6% | 9.8% | 8.5% | 7.4% |
T6o | 46.3% | 29.2% | 21.2% | 16.5% | 13.4% | 11.2% | 9.5% | 8.3% | 7.3% |
64o | 38.0% | 24.7% | 18.2% | 14.4% | 12.0% | 10.3% | 9.2% | 8.3% | 7.6% |
Q4o | 49.0% | 30.2% | 21.4% | 16.4% | 13.3% | 11.0% | 9.4% | 8.1% | 7.1% |
85o | 41.7% | 26.5% | 19.4% | 15.2% | 12.4% | 10.5% | 9.1% | 8.1% | 7.3% |
J6o | 47.9% | 29.8% | 21.4% | 16.5% | 13.2% | 11.0% | 9.3% | 8.0% | 7.0% |
53o | 35.8% | 23.3% | 17.1% | 13.6% | 11.4% | 9.9% | 8.8% | 8.0% | 7.3% |
Q3o | 47.9% | 29.2% | 20.7% | 15.9% | 12.8% | 10.7% | 9.1% | 7.9% | 6.9% |
J5o | 47.1% | 29.1% | 20.7% | 15.9% | 12.8% | 10.6% | 8.9% | 7.7% | 6.7% |
Q2o | 47.0% | 28.4% | 19.9% | 15.3% | 12.3% | 10.3% | 8.8% | 7.7% | 6.8% |
74o | 38.6% | 24.5% | 17.9% | 13.9% | 11.4% | 9.7% | 8.5% | 7.6% | 6.8% |
J4o | 46.1% | 28.1% | 19.9% | 15.3% | 12.3% | 10.2% | 8.6% | 7.5% | 6.5% |
43o | 34.4% | 22.3% | 16.3% | 12.8% | 10.7% | 9.3% | 8.3% | 7.5% | 6.8% |
95o | 42.9% | 26.7% | 19.2% | 14.8% | 12.0% | 10.0% | 8.5% | 7.4% | 6.6% |
J3o | 45.0% | 27.1% | 19.1% | 14.6% | 11.7% | 9.8% | 8.3% | 7.2% | 6.3% |
T5o | 44.2% | 27.1% | 19.3% | 14.8% | 11.9% | 9.9% | 8.4% | 7.2% | 6.4% |
63o | 35.9% | 22.7% | 16.4% | 12.8% | 10.6% | 9.1% | 8.0% | 7.2% | 6.5% |
J2o | 44.0% | 26.2% | 18.4% | 14.1% | 11.3% | 9.4% | 8.0% | 7.0% | 6.2% |
T4o | 43.4% | 26.4% | 18.7% | 14.3% | 11.5% | 9.5% | 8.1% | 7.0% | 6.2% |
T3o | 42.4% | 25.5% | 18.0% | 13.7% | 11.0% | 9.1% | 7.8% | 6.8% | 6.0% |
84o | 39.6% | 24.4% | 17.5% | 13.4% | 10.8% | 9.0% | 7.8% | 6.8% | 6.1% |
52o | 33.9% | 21.3% | 15.3% | 12.0% | 10.0% | 8.6% | 7.6% | 6.8% | 6.2% |
T2o | 41.5% | 24.7% | 17.3% | 13.2% | 10.6% | 8.8% | 7.5% | 6.6% | 5.8% |
42o | 32.5% | 20.5% | 14.7% | 11.5% | 9.5% | 8.3% | 7.3% | 6.6% | 6.0% |
94o | 40.7% | 24.6% | 17.3% | 13.2% | 10.5% | 8.7% | 7.3% | 6.4% | 5.6% |
73o | 36.6% | 22.4% | 16.0% | 12.3% | 9.9% | 8.4% | 7.2% | 6.4% | 5.7% |
93o | 39.9% | 23.9% | 16.7% | 12.7% | 10.1% | 8.3% | 7.1% | 6.1% | 5.4% |
32o | 31.2% | 19.5% | 13.9% | 10.8% | 8.9% | 7.7% | 6.8% | 6.1% | 5.6% |
62o | 34.0% | 20.7% | 14.6% | 11.2% | 9.1% | 7.8% | 6.8% | 6.0% | 5.4% |
92o | 38.9% | 22.9% | 16.0% | 12.1% | 9.6% | 8.0% | 6.8% | 5.9% | 5.2% |
83o | 37.5% | 22.4% | 15.7% | 11.9% | 9.5% | 7.9% | 6.7% | 5.8% | 5.1% |
82o | 36.8% | 21.7% | 15.1% | 11.4% | 9.1% | 7.5% | 6.4% | 5.6% | 4.9% |
72o | 34.6% | 20.4% | 14.2% | 10.7% | 8.6% | 7.2% | 6.1% | 5.4% | 4.8% |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2011
(95)
-
▼
April
(17)
- The Poker Meister #71
- Card cheating with the deal / 2p2 Concept of the Week
- No sooner than I wonder.... Pokerstars responds!
- When and how? Cashout for P* & FT
- A bit of good news - we'll get our money back!
- Hand charts... A Monte Carlo simulation
- While the sky is falling...
- What would you do? #235 - More live play
- A Mookie / Dank win!
- When it rains, it pours... Part II
- Steps taken to legalize online poker within Washin...
- Stupid things said at the table
- What would you do? #234 - AA no good?
- The rules of the Run Good
- What would you do? #233 - A little live play...
- When it rains, it pours...
- New Micros episode!
-
▼
April
(17)