tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9142521684451555818.post4222955294661355974..comments2023-12-01T14:39:41.613-05:00Comments on Just the facts... a low stakes poker blog: What would you do? #4The Poker Meisterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18289059101454598371noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9142521684451555818.post-35315400991508213042009-09-21T14:55:37.542-04:002009-09-21T14:55:37.542-04:00@noldmax
I call for a twofold reason. I call to ...@noldmax<br /><br />I call for a twofold reason. I call to set mine, but I also call, feeling as though I may very well be good. In fact, I think this is the first time I've seen him 3 bet, but I have 140 hands on him. I don't expect / think he's going to be firing out near pot on the flop with TT, JJ after a big RR and I'm calling. Morever, I don't think he's RRing PFThe Poker Meisterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18289059101454598371noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9142521684451555818.post-91566237962768033952009-09-21T12:10:48.430-04:002009-09-21T12:10:48.430-04:00Meister,
Seeing villain's 3-bet% would help, ...Meister,<br /><br />Seeing villain's 3-bet% would help, since it might give us some insight into what range of hands he is 3-betting. I'll often 4-bet QQ+, since a lot of players are 3-betting much worse, and the bad ones may call a 4-bet. But given his tight #'s, calling is OK.<br /><br />But, you can't play QQ just to setmine here. You will be a loser if you are calling noldmaxhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06632933577001519894noreply@blogger.com